We are not good examples of "top level Banes" so don't take last night's beatings with as much weight as you feel. Its not that bad.
His bane could not be high lvl ( even if you don't know that ) but it doesn't take specific game skill to breakdown a matchup and the options a char has against another.
Although true, he didn't have this opinion (or at least not openly) until last night's lobby.
True, I didn't. I truly thought it was 6-4, but if you actually think that Batman we played was SKILLED as a player/thinker, you're insane brother. A scrubby Batman can beat 3-4 competent Bane players who are far from scrubs, that SCREAMS 7-3 matchup
You charged into about 3 parries for free. I'm not particularly familiar with the batman MU either.
I think that right there should tell you how bad that matchup is.
I saw you get snagged by things that you should have been capable of avoiding. Hell, even MLGzus caught him with about 7 or 8 AA grabs (which are surprisingly good btw) and lost out because of his command grab habits. Keep us out? He can batarang, trait, and zip line. All 3 let us cover half the screen and if he jumps away, cover another half and sit in his face. If you know his only option to open us up is that j.2, then double punch his arse.
Its not hard to get in though. All of us got in, but we all got scrubbed out for whatever reason. And he hit him with about 8 of them, they don't do THAT much damage. He also punished every batslide with a d.1 and nothing else, when a b.23 would've done a much better job. We all made mistakes, that doesn't say a thing about the MU.
The batman was scrubby, he fired off his trait at full screen instead of using it to cover himself coming in. We all got scrubbed out, it happens. I've been scrubbed out by Deathstroke before, but imo that MU is in our favor now. Bats isn't easy, but one scrub beating a few decent people? Happens, literally, ALL THE TIME.
Block dash, block dash, let him jump back into the corner while I take about 10% in chip.
So basically if you lose against a character used in a scrubby manner, and other people do too, its automatically a losing MU?
Maybe once or twice, yea. But a scrub getting consistent win streaks on good players doesn't happen unless it's a bad matchup.
There were 4 of us in the room. He had a streak of 10.
If he chanses upon 4 meter, he will build about 1/3th of a single bar burning every single batarang, firing off trait, and the like. In the time it takes him to activate his trait (if he is firing it off one at a time) we get a dash. Every batarang, a dash. If he wastes all of his meter burning them, more power to him but the lack of a push block, wager capability, and meter burning for his combos will hurt him more.
Ok, now you're losing me in the argument. We all agree it's a bad MU already. You said yourself Bane loses 6-4. I'm not really understanding why it's so important for me to say it's 6-4 vs 7-3 to be honest. IMO, it's 7-3 and I gave my reasons and opinion why. You are stating 6-4, ok cool. However, that's still a losing MU, no?
Theres a difference between 7-3 and 6-4 as you stated yourself. 6-4 is difficult but manageable, while 7-3 is us having to do 90% more work while in reality its the same amount of work just applied in a different way. 6-4 isn't often considered a "losing" MU so much as a "disadvantageous" MU. If you run a 6-4 against someone, you have an advantage but its not particularly or completely in your favour.