What's new

UPDATED Top 5 MKX Players - Based off Results & Opinion. King delivers the boot

CrimsonShadow

Administrator and Community Engineer
Administrator
I see we're back to downplaying EVO when it's most convenient and suits our argument re: whatever player we're trying to boost/downplay. Some things never change.

In before "EVO is important but not the end all be all"...until your favorite wins it.
EVO should not be downplayed -- it's the biggest fighting game tournament in the world and deserves to be respected as such. But championing the number of events you've won (and prize money collected) when you don't have to play the guy who actually *won* EVO, and has been at almost every major event in the states keeping other top players at bay, isn't a fair comparison in the slightest.
 

coolwhip

Noob
The event he didn't win, which he very well could have won if Sonic Fox wasn't there. And that's the problem with comparing wins and prize dollars.

That event is also one out of 3 events he attended here. And the other two were far from 'breezed through'. Yet he's never missed a grand finals in the EU. I think the difference in difficulty of winning it all is entirely clear from the facts.
But it was the most recent one he attended (that counts for a lot since it's a better reflection of everyone's current skill levels) and the biggest (that counts for even more, even though it's not as big as YOMI locals). Obviously the level of competition is deeper in the US, but 5 Europeans got 25th or better at EVO. Considering the percentage of Europeans that were actually there, that's pretty remarkable. So a major like the most recent one that Madzin one counts for a lot.
 

coolwhip

Noob
EVO should not be downplayed -- it's the biggest fighting game tournament in the world and deserves to be respected as such. But championing the number of events you've won (and prize money collected) when you don't have to play the guy who actually *won* EVO, and has been at almost every major event in the states keeping other top players at bay, isn't a fair comparison in the slightest.
Second argument has nothing to do with the first. Obviously not having to play Fox always makes it easier than having to play Fox. My point was about EVO and EVO only. Has nothing to do with Foxy championing his winnings.

And by the way, I can think of much more absurd stuff that's been said in this thread than someone simply stating what his resume is (*Cough*YOMILocalsAreTougherThanMajors*Cough*). Let's deal with that first.
 

CrimsonShadow

Administrator and Community Engineer
Administrator
But it was the most recent one he attended (that counts for a lot since it's a better reflection of everyone's current skill levels) and the biggest (that counts for even more, even though it's not as big as YOMI locals). Obviously the level of competition is deeper in the US, but 5 Europeans got 25th or better at EVO. Considering the percentage of Europeans that were actually there, that's pretty remarkable. So a major like the most recent one that Madzin one counts for a lot.
And he still didn't win, becuase he had to play Fox. So even if you're only counting the most recent tournament, there's no way to get around the fact that having to play Fox at every big event here is a significant obstacle to both winning events and collecting the biggest prize pot split for the other North American top players and teams.

Maintaining that it has nothing to do with it is sheer lunacy.
 
Last edited:

BigMacMcLovin

B2s and Birdarangs
I finally reached the end!

Dissapointed with the fact that I haven't seen a selfie from Sonic Fox of him eating $100,000 worth of popcorn in the 18 pages I've just read but meh.

Foxy is #1. #TheBestOfBritish

As you were...
 

protools27

Rebel without a scene
idk foxy won almoust anything he entered and when they finally met, foxy has proven that he can stand
Besides placing second at evo and winning euro esl what has foxy won? No doubt hes a great player, I'm not downplaying his skills at all. But DJT won CEO and X Battles which was super stacked, placed second at ECT and EGL in dallas. Overall he has more actually wins and more top places then foxy, which may very well have to do with participating in more touraments then foxy, but it has to count for something. DJT has also beat sonicfox in tournament, something Foxy has failed to do.
 

coolwhip

Noob
And he still didn't win, becuase he had to play Fox. So even if you're only counting the most recent tournament, there's no way to get around the fact that having to play Fox at every big event here is a significant obstacle to both winning events and collecting the biggest prize pot split for US top players.

Maintaining that it has nothing to do with it is sheer lunacy.
So the knock on the guy is...he "only" got second at EVO and didn't beat Sonic Fox? But ignoring that he mopped up every other player he played, including Denzell and HoneyBee (two insanely good players who belong on the list?).

Anyway, here's where this is going: Crimson continues to make the most selective arguments ever but states it confidently enough to come off like he's making sense.

The only thing I maintained was that EVO is huge. Not that not playing Fox doesn't have a huge effect on tournament results. Don't try to sway things and adding words like "lunacy" to come off like you have a great case. You always have a knack of doing that to provide a false sense of confidence behind your arguments. There was downplaying of EVO in this thread, and it was completely unrelated to Fox. All I said was "I see we're continuing to downplay EVO." You took that comment, related it to Foxy's argument about his winnings, and related it to him not having beaten Sonic Fox, added the word "lunacy" and put it in my mouth. Again, I said nothing about any of that. My whole point is getting second at EVO is a big ass deal, and trumps a lot of the accomplishments mentioned in this thread. Period.
 
Last edited:
And he still didn't win, becuase he had to play Fox. So even if you're only counting the most recent tournament, there's no way to get around the fact that having to play Fox at every big event here is a significant obstacle to both winning events and collecting the biggest prize pot split for US top players.

Maintaining that it has nothing to do with it is sheer lunacy.
But nobody is comparing his UK/Europe wins with US majors. Otherwise Foxy would be nr1 if it weren't for evo. The thing is foxy is without a doubt nr1 in his region and its not even close. You could take away 70% of foxy's wins and he would still be nr1 in his region hands down. This + proving himself at evo makes him top 3 at worst. You could also make the argument that sonic fox isn't familiar with most of Uk's players and could get upset by some players there. I know this is unlikely, but foxy is the most proven player in terms of international competition, which imo is also something to consider.
 

coolwhip

Noob
The event he didn't win, which he very well could have won if Sonic Fox wasn't there. And that's the problem with comparing wins and prize dollars.

That event is also one out of 3 events he attended here. And the other two were far from -- breezed through. Yet he's never missed a grand finals in the EU. I think the difference in difficulty of winning it all is entirely clear from the facts.

Rate of making grand finals in the EU -- 100%
Rate of making grand finals in the US -- 33%

Percentage of events won in UK -- 60/70%
Percentage of events won in UK -- 0% (0/3)

Annnnnnnnd there it is...more numbers that literally equate every tournament. I'm done here.
 

CrimsonShadow

Administrator and Community Engineer
Administrator
So the knock on the guy is...he "only" got second at EVO and didn't beat Sonic Fox? But ignoring that he mopped up every other player he played, including Denzell and HoneyBee (two insanely good players who belong on the list?).

Anyway, here's where this is going: Crimson continues to make the most selective arguments ever but states it confidently enough to come off like he's making sense.

The only thing I maintained was that EVO is huge. Not that not playing Fox has a huge effect on tournament results. Don't try to sway things and adding words like "lunacy" to come off like you have a great case. You always have a knack of doing that to provide a false sense of confidence behind your arguments. There was downplaying of EVO in this thread, and it was completely unrelated to Fox. All I said was "I see we're continuing to downplay EVO." You took that comment, related it to Foxy's argument about his winnings, and related it to him not having beaten Sonic Fox, added the word "lunacy" and put it in my mouth. Again, I said nothing about any of that. My whole point is getting second at EVO is a big ass deal, and trumps a lot of the accomplishments mentioned in this thread. Period.
That's not a knock. Foxy's a great player, and that's a great accomplishment.

I am speaking purely about holding up sheer number of tournaments wins though, and total prize money collected.

In truth though, it's actually you who's downplaying here. By attempting to argue that not having to play the guy who won EVO (and won a good deal of the other US events) doesn't make it easier to place 1st at events and collect the largest sums of money.

If you are maintaining that having a roughly 65-70% record of winning UK events (and collecting the max prize money), but a 0% record of winning US events, is pure coincidence, and ignoring the 800 pound Fox in the room, I have a bridge to sell you.
 

coolwhip

Noob
\

In truth though, it's actually you who's downplaying here. By attempting to argue that not having to play the guy who won EVO (and won a good deal of the other US events) doesn't make it much easier to win events and collect the largest sums of money.
Where the fuck did I argue that? Please show me. I explicitly said "OBVIOUSLY not having to play Sonic Fox is a lot easier than having to play Sonic Fox." That's literally quite the opposite of what you're claiming I'm arguing.

But hey, if you keep putting words in my mouth, and using words like "lunacy" then obviously it'll mean you're right.

But again, please show me where I made the argument I'm claiming I made. I mean, digging up posts is your specialty, right?

In before Crimson digs up a post in which he conveniently interprets something I said, while conveniently ignoring the post in which I flat out said not having to play Fox is always an advantage for someone.
 

CrimsonShadow

Administrator and Community Engineer
Administrator
Where the fuck did I argue that? Please show me. I explicitly said "OBVIOUSLY not having to play Sonic Fox is a lot easier than having to play Sonic Fox." That's literally quite the opposite of what you're claiming I'm arguing.

But hey, if you keep putting words in my mouth, and using words like "lunacy" then obviously it'll mean you're right.

But again, please show me where I made the argument I'm claiming I made. I mean, digging up posts is your specialty, right?

In before Crimson digs up a post in which he conveniently interprets something I said, while conveniently ignoring the post in which I flat out said not having to play Fox is always an advantage for someone.
That's all I've said in every post, and you've argued with all of them. My entire point was that saying "let's compare the number of events I/we've won and prize money I/we've won to everyone else" isn't a reliable comparison when you don't have to play the undisputed best player in the world, along with 2-3 other absolute Top 3-4 players in the world, to win each big-money major.
 
Last edited:
That's not a knock. Foxy's a great player, and that's a great accomplishment.

I am speaking purely about holding up sheer number of tournaments wins though, and total prize money collected.

In truth though, it's actually you who's downplaying here. By attempting to argue that not having to play the guy who won EVO (and won a good deal of the other US events) doesn't make it easier to place 1st at events and collect the largest sums of money.

If you are maintaining that having a roughly 65-70% record of winning UK events (and collecting the max prize money), but a 0% record of winning US events, is pure coincidence, and ignoring the 800 pound Fox in the room, I have a bridge to sell you.
The thing is foxy will never be able to attend that many us majors. Prob 3 US majors a year at most. He is dominant in his region and has proven himself at evo and has beaten honeybee and djt on his way to second place, so his path to grand finals was definitely not easy. Evo SHOULD be that important because it is the main way for players outside the US to prove themselves. If anything MKX has made it possible for international players to travel to Evo, so Evo should now be more important than it was in mk9 and injustice.
 
Also we don't have to make it like foxy will lose again if he meets sonic fox in tournament. He has a good chance beating sonic fox just like honeybee and djt do. So you can also make the case that djt, honeybee and sonic don't have to fight foxy to win their majors.
 

CrimsonShadow

Administrator and Community Engineer
Administrator
The thing is foxy will never be able to attend that many us majors. Prob 3 US majors a year at most. He is dominant in his region and has proven himself at evo and has beaten honeybee and djt on his way to second place, so his path to grand finals was definitely not easy. Evo SHOULD be that important because it is the main way for players outside the US to prove themselves. If anything MKX has made it possible for international players to travel to Evo, so Evo should now be more important than it was in mk9 and injustice.
That's fine -- and It should still be commendable. As I said, it's a huge accomplishment, and something most people will never be able to do. It's something to be very proud of.

However, that doesn't change the fact that comparing your prize money won, and overall number of event wins to guys that have to go through Sonic and company at every single event in order to win, is not a fair comparison at all.

Also we don't have to make it like foxy will lose again if he meets sonic fox in tournament. He has a good chance beating sonic fox just like honeybee and djt do. So you can also make the case that djt, honeybee and sonic don't have to fight foxy to win their majors.
Then you'd have to make the argument that it's just as likely DJT might beat Foxy in a runback (or Honeybee, etc), should they face in tourney again. So for each player involved, if you make the argument that they're equally likely to beat each other, the chances of any particular player winning (and collecting the top prize) still goes down by the number of those absolute top players in attendance.

Wheras when there's only one of the Top 4-5 players in the world in attendance at any big major, then it's far more likely that they'll win.
 
That's fine -- and It should still be commendable. As I said, it's a huge accomplishment, and something most people will never be able to do. It's something to be very proud of.

However, that doesn't change the fact that comparing your prize money won, and overall number of event wins to guys that have to go through Sonic and company at every single event in order to win, is not a fair comparison at all.


Then you'd have to make the argument that it's just as likely DJT might beat him (or Honeybee, etc), should they face in tourney again. So for each player involved, if you make the argument that they're equally likely to beat each other, the chances of any particular player winning (and collecting the top prize) still goes down by the number of those absolute top players in attendance.
Like I said before, I or others shouldn't be comparing uk majors to us majors. It's his uk wins + beating djt and honeybee at evo for 2nd place that is making him the 2nd best player. The money thing shouldn't be that relevant for ranking a player, I agree.

Everyone knows that honeybee and djt are also capable of beating foxy. I just represent the other side of the discussion, because plenty of people would make that case for djt and honeybee.
 
A foxy grandpa beat djt with relative ease at evo everyone thought djt was the best kung lao and foxy proved otherwise idk how forever king thinks he's better but I don't see it i probably rank king like 8th