there is an article how they work on the online performance past lauch and it is actually comparable.
This is on point. We all agree of course about their priorities, but keeping it professional is the way to go here
so are you guys fine with just leaving the "pointless" out but still mentioning the live action trailer? the passage is about the impression some people get of nrs, which is more about reflecting them a public image they might start to build than criticizing actual facts, i doubt that the resources used for the trailer or advertisement have anything to do with polishing the online.
Telling them about your opinion of their percieved public image is not going to help. Stick to the changes that we want and why we want them. IMO.
dont you think it matters to them if people start building up that "greedy company" picture? i mean thats what people said in the last thread, and im sure thats not the way nrs see themselves or want to be seen.
can you post this article? I only saw the mp1st one about the 120hz which is not relevant for mkx (for the most part)
Dunno marketing hardly improves the game but is important for its success so you cant really blame them for doing it though I am not a fan of the live action stuff
Then hire the company that NRS hired to generate the signatures for them.
thats the article i meant. the crucial sentence for me is "Regardless of this, the potential breakthroughs that might surface from this type of work are what make the trouble worth it."
thx, and thats why im asking
!
Yes what they did is impressive but its kinda in another "work area". It's like saying to car manufacturer "Hey trains transport more humans and are also fast. Why dont you adapt their methods?" Trains and cars transport things. Bf4 Mkx connect player. They have some similarities they can learn from each other but they also have their unique problems which require unique solutions.
i will leave this up for discussion. at least it shows dice realizes problems and works on solution, which we havent seen from nrs yet.
The way I see it they have had the worst online by a wide margin 3 games in a row now. It's one of the most common legitimate complaints about NRS games. If they know, that's good. I think by making it known that it's constantly at the forefront of some consumers minds and the negative impact has on the franchise as a whole is a good thing. Maybe the fourth game will actually have good netcode that is comparable amongst competitors. For 3 games now just pointing out the online isn't good and carrying on as normal hasn't garnered any improvement.
Maybe it's more on the backend like a contract agreement or something they have little or no control over. I agree for the last 4 years of NRS games the netcode has been awful. We are all aware, They are aware.
It could very well be something out of their control. Comparisons to other games especially ones released before (besides KI) will happen. I just hope this along with some push from NRS will get the resources needed for great online play. With WB backing them I just don't see how they fail where many have succeeded. Cut the excess like factions which don't even really do anything and show that great online play will boosts sales way more than anything. Probably only getting beat by the actual game and story mode.
