This is why its also not really helpful if people provide you with differing matchup numbers, rather than being general like
@Skedar70 was being. Us discussing matchup numbers here won't really make a difference, because "these matchups have been discussed at length." You guys put a lot of effort into this but I think there are some pretty glaring holes. Who knows how tiers would change if every matchup number was "perfect" - that not really important - at the same time I think its pretty silly to just call people fools who disagree with the chart.
This isn't true at all. At an earlier point in the process I had a general feeling that Black Adam's MU chart
did have a lot of holes in it and questioned you guys about it on the Black Adam Discord. Matchup changes that
you specifically suggested were brought up there, by me, and maybe one or two of them were further examined and altered based on the suggestions that
you specifically made.
A central part of our directive was to represent our respective character's community as a whole, not just to make an arbitrary list of which MU's the people in the Character Council itself struggled and did well against. Objectivity was the goal, and you don't accomplish that by being insular and ignoring outside suggestions.
Hence, we're not only open to, but we
welcome well-thought out critiques of particular matchups in our tier list. By the same token, people criticizing or dismissing the entire list based on not liking a character's placement, and absent any mention of particular MU's, is an eye roll that we already anticipated we would be doing a lot of.
Espio is also on point when he states that just claiming MU numbers as different probably isn't overly constructive as well, if somebody isn't prepared to explain their reasoning when questioned.